Skip to main content

About your Search

20120929
20121007
STATION
CNBC 4
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4
CNBC
Oct 4, 2012 9:00am EDT
the debate, we saw that dropping in terms of chances for obama to be re-elected. i'm wondering, do you buy into the notion that perhaps stock futures are up this morning because it is perceived that romney did well in this debate? >> stock futures were up 7 1/2, at the top of the debate when it looked like he was really winning. at 4:00 a.m., they went back to 3 1/2. then spain did a fairly reasonable auction. >> auction, yeah. >> ecb. this debate had people transfixed for at least 27 to 35 minutes. in the stock market. then we were to, as always, which will spain survive? >> as we said, tomorrow the data continues. we'll get a jobs number. earnings on tuesday with alcoa. the media loves a comeback. that's what they'll spit out today. things could be very different in 24 hours. >> and you did a great job, i'd have to tell you, that the horse race element of it has always intrigued me as someone in media, but if i were a betting person and there was a stock obama is supposed to in trade, then i would say, look. i'm not buying puts. >> you'd be neutral. you'd have a neutral rating? a market
CNBC
Oct 4, 2012 6:00am EDT
-- they thought newt was such a great debater, they wanted to see someone like newt talk to president obama about his policies and about the last four years. and they thought newt would have been the guy to do it. and i don't think that the republicans now feel like they lost a step by having romney there. and in watching, i've tried to sometimes espouse free market principles, private sector language about how to approach certain things. and i got to tell you, there were a couple times last night where my eyes just got wider as i listened and, i don't know, sometimes your stances can make you -- if you're right about policy, it just -- maybe it's easier to win a debate. >> well, joe, a couple points. first of all, i think you're dead on about the gingrich point because i think mitt romney was newt gingrich's superior in the debate for the reason that i mentioned before. if you go after an incumbent president, you have to do it in the right way and new gingrich and proven over and over that he overtorts his rhetoric and goes too far and ultimately makes himself look bad. the other thing that romn
CNBC
Oct 4, 2012 1:00pm EDT
money to work today based on extrapolations from what you heard or your sense of who won the debate, you think that's a fool's game? >> i do. >> let's talk about where you see -- stick with politics. beginning of the year you said you expected president obama to be re-elected. do you still believe that? >> yes. yes. i really do. i think that he was maybe two scores up as i heard on "squawk box" this morning. maybe now it is only one. i still think in terms of looking at these battleground states and where he appears to have a competitive advantage, he's still ahead. >> you were extremely accurate in your overall call, at least as of this date, of how the market was going to perform. you said about 15% in 2012. that's about where we are. is now a good time to invest? and then what's going to happen in 2013. >> i would be much more cautious now. we divided our analysis of the market into two parts. there's the things people normally talk about, growth rates and earnings and the economy, but also the discount rate. the interest rate plus this other fear or uncertainty factor. the fed's acti
CNBC
Oct 5, 2012 9:00am EDT
the idea that the labor department is cooking these numbers to help president obama. people said that during the bush administration too. they accused the bush administration of doing that. it is just not true. doesn't happen that way. and i think people need to have a real debate over the argument and not a cartoon debate about somehow darkened conspiracies with the number. >> so the discussion will happen on the sunday shows whether or not the week was about the president's performance in the debate, or this economic data. which wins? which one is more important? >> you know, the debate was seen by tens of millions of people. i think that's important. i've said all along during the campaign, the jobless numbers have been hyped in their importance because people are living in this economy. they feel what's happening to their lives and their own prospects. this is good news for the president but doesn't change what voters already know about their own lives and the prospects for their kids to get ahead, the prospects for them to get jobs if they don't have jobs now. i wouldn't ove
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4